Check out some strong plays here

[Cappthespread.com]

Here we go, back to normal posting after a bad week, we hit Saturday off going 5-1!

Today's Bonus Play is:

Air Force (-1.5)

Another game I think will do well is

Georgia Southern (-4)

This is going to be a big month for us, I can tell. Were right at 60% last month we could have done better if we hadn't of hit that losing streak at the end of the month. Good luck today everyone, Looks like some great plays.

 

[pja101]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Cappthespread:
This is going to be a big month for us, I can tell. Were right at 60% last month we could have done better if we hadn't of hit that losing streak at the end of the month. Good luck today everyone, Looks like some great plays.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

...and you would've done worse had you not hit that winning streak in the beginning of the month.

 

[Cappthespread.com]

When you average 60% it's more likely to have winning streaks, that's just statistics.

 

[pja101]

Nobody consistently hits at 60%, especially touts. If you're on a little 60% run, you'll begin to regress to your mean, that's statistics.

 

[pja101]

.

 

[Cappthespread.com]

You may not hit sixty percent, however I do. Do not come into my thread and tell me I do not do something, it is quite clear that I do hit sixty percent. If you want a list of our plays check my site, it is updated everyday with our plays.

BTW We won with Charleston tonight. Sorry, PJA101 your wrong.

 

[SmokeyWins]

PJA...

I HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT THIS GUY CAPPTHESPREAD BUT PEOPLE (TOUTS INCLUDED) DO GO 60% HELL I'M OVER 70% FOR THE YEAR....

SORRY YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE WINNING

 

[pja101]

I see I'm talking with two touts here. It will probably be tough for you guys to follow, but if you read each word S L O W L Y, you might at least understand part of what I'm going to say.

You can certainly maintain 60% for one season, or possibly even for one calendar year if you're lucky, but you can't maintain that for a long period of time(years).

And if you're one of those playing 1-2 games a day to keep your percentage up, you're losing out on money. Here's a question you can relate to:
If Scamdicapper A averaged six plays per day for one year at 55%, and Scamdicapper B averaged 2 plays per day for one year at 60%, who would end up with more money?
Note:this excludes charge for service and assumes that there exist two scamdicappers who actually play what they give out.

Basically, a 60% win rate is TOO HIGH. You're missing out on many winners. 53-59% games are also valueable, and you'd be missing out on them.

And one more thing, someone hitting 60-70% certainly wouldn't need to charge others $10 a night or whatever it is you morons charge.

 

[Cappthespread.com]

PJA, how is a 60% rate too high? The best handicappers hit around 62%, that's documented, look at the oklahoma tracking service, you will see people who hit above 60% year after year.

Do not come into my thread and call me a liar. You are a second rate loser who has no class and obviously no skills. And the answer to your question is the person who plays 1-2 games a day. If you place the same amount of money as you would play on your 5-6 games a day you will make far more because you will lose less. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out but I can tell it does take an idiot like yourself to screw it up. Please do not come into my threads anymore, we don't need people who hit 48% of their games coming in and telling true professionals like myself that they can't do something they have already done.

 

[pja101]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Cappthespread:
And the answer to your question is the person who plays 1-2 games a day. If you place the same amount of money as you would play on your 5-6 games a day you will make far more because you will lose less. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Really? I knew you weren't bright, but this really is elementary math.
365*6=2190*55%=1204.5
2190-1204.5=985.5 W-L=(1204.5-985.5)
1204.5*100=120450
985.5*110=108405
120450-108405=+$12,045

365*2=730*60%=438
730-438=292 W-L=(438-492)
438*100=43800
292*110=32120
43800-32120=

$12,045>$11,680
Who's the idiot?

If you couldn't answer that question correctly, I certainly won't even attempt to explain to you why 60% is actually TOO HIGH. BTW, I do just fine in my wagering, thanks. I don't pretend to consistently hit 60% year after year. But, you can just consider me the as Example "A" above, and yourself "B," and you should be able to figure out who does better.

But hey, look on the bright side-if you keep putting the ten dollars your 5 clients pay you for your shitty plays every day in your piggy bank, you'll have saved $18,250, and might be able to move out of your parents' basement in a year.

[This message was edited by pja101 on February 03, 2004 at 01:34 PM.]

 

[Cappthespread.com]

You don't seem to get it do you ass hole?

LOOK:

If you wager the same amount per day on 2 games as you do on 6 you get a much greater margin. Do you know how to read?

365*6=2190*55%=1204.5
2190-1204.5=985.5 W-L=(1204.5-985.5)
1204.5*100=120450
985.5*110=108405
120450-108405=+$12,045

365*2=700*60%=420
700-420=280 W-L=(420-280)
420*300=126000
280*300=84000
126000-84000=+$42000

12045<42000

Jeez, who is the dumbass now? If you could comprehend simple finance you would realize that by wagering the same amount as you would on 6 games and having the same winning percentage you would make more than 3 times more. ****in idiot.

 

[Cappthespread.com]

You even quoted me saying the way to do it and you still messed it up. Buy the plays I have then spend the money you make on buying yourself an education.

 

[Cappthespread.com]

yeah not much left to say is there pja? You have no reason to come into my thread and dogg me for something that is completely wrong. You don't even know what is going on, do you even know where you are? Dude stop doing the drugs, and seek some help.

 

[richdude57]

THATS FUNNNNNNY

BOY THATS FUNNY
. GOOD NITE

THE DUDE &gt

~

 

[fivedoorsdown]

pja. fyi it can be done.
i've done it the last two years in COLLEGE FOOTBALL. posted right here. i know 26 games over 500 based on 120 plays is well around 60%.
and its documented right here.
fyi i am not a tout but i do know it can be done.

 

[pja101]

Wow. Just when I tought you couldn't prove yourself any less educated, you've done it. The numbers in your equation don't make one bit of sense. I don't have time to explain wagering 101 to you right now, but rest assured, I'll be back when I have the time in a few hours, and try to explain it to you once more.

And fivedoorsdown, read this thread again. You're not following.

 

[crazycat]

Actually pja, you are wrong. The whole point of the arguement is hitting sixty percent and wheteher you can make more betting 6 or 2 games at $600.00 per day. So it is (6) $100.00 wagers or (2) $300.00 wagers. Your numbers above are correct except you multiply each wager by $300.00 on the second leg. That is why cappthespread is correct.

Crazy Cat

 

[delmo]

I may be stupid but dosesn't 365*2=730?

 

[Excell]

Capp,

In a typical equation, you need to compare apple to apple and orange to orange So if you use 100/110 for player A then you need to use the same number for player B. Otherwise, anyone can argue in their favor by using the bigger number in their calculation to benefit their equation.

 

[jimmymo]

delmo, that is tooooo funny and you are not the stupid one...

The disconnect here is that pja is assuming that you are betting the same amount per game whether you bet 2 games a day or 6 games a day.

Caps argument is that you have a finite amount to bet each day and it is better to use that money on two games with larger bets than 6 games with smaller better (i.e., based on the premise of "less games, bigger bets")

Good topic though...and do check your math